Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

SUBMISSIONS FROM THE PUBLIC

Members of the public sent to the Assembly a total of 1,603 public submissions during the 13 months ended 27 September 2004. And you can access them all lower down on this page.

Incidentally, the numbers on the submissions appear to show that there are 1,669 of them. After allowing for blanks, duplications and those submissions that were later withdrawn by the people who sent them, the real total is 1,603. Unfortunately, we cannot renumber the submissions to reflect that.

If a posted submission is dated after 27 September, that date refers to the date the submission was processed and posted to the website, not the date it was received. 

To help you navigate through the 1,603 submissions received from the public, here are:
  1. An introduction to the submissions, available as a Word document (40KB) or as a PDF document (110KB).
  2. A link to the View Submissions page, where you can read and/or search 1,603 submissions
  3. A complete list of the submissions and their abstracts, available as an Excel spreadsheet (472KB) or as a PDF (348KB)
  4. A guide to the longer submissions (i.e., 80 submissions that run four or more pages in length). This guide is available as a Word document (36KB) or as a PDF file (96KB).
  5. A list of the 80 longer submissions, indexed by electoral system and including abstracts. This list is available as an Excel spreadsheet (40KB) or as a PDF item (90KB).

Submission List

To read a submission in full, click on the submitter's name/number
Sort by Submission Date | Sort by Last Name

PEARCE-1340

Please change the voting system in BC to some version of MMP. Please do not divide the province between urban and rural areas and give each a different voting system. It will only give a reason for grievance between these areas. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Bernadette Pearce
Date: Aug 13, 2004

STANLEY-1339

I favour the Mixed Member Proportional [MMP] voting system which provides proportional representation with clearly defined candidates and parties. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Mr David Stanley
Date: Aug 13, 2004

WEESE-1338

MMP is the best option because at least one of my two votes is almost sure to count. The cost of enlarging the constituencies is worth my getting to vote for a party and for a local representative.  [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Mr Gordon Weese
Date: Aug 13, 2004

CLARKE-1337

MMP is the best system of voting because it allows voters more flexibility and will increase the diversity of views in the government. There will be more interest in the elections when voters don't feel like winners and losers. [2 pages]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Susan Clarke
Date: Aug 13, 2004

THORNBURGH-1336

Certainly there are drawbacks in any system we might choose. But in my study of several of the better-known voting systems, it seems that an MMP system is the fairest and perhaps the clearest to understand. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Mr Jack Thornburgh
Date: Aug 13, 2004

Previous
Page 66 of 321 | Go To Page:
Submissions per page:
Next
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy