Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission CLARKE-1337 (Online)

Submission By Susan Clarke
AddressVictoria, BC, Canada
OrganizationThe Broad Coalition
Date20040813
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
MMP is the best system of voting because it allows voters more flexibility and will increase the diversity of views in the government. There will be more interest in the elections when voters don't feel like winners and losers. [2 pages]

Submission Content
The Broad Coalition

The Broad Coalition has conducted a number of on-the-street voter surveys over the past year. Forty per cent of the voters surveyed were not aligned with any party. A large number of undecided voters say they vote for the candidate based on their track record or their platform. Many voters were conflicted because they may want to vote for a certain local candidate but they want to support another party. The frustration arising from these conflicts may result in the voter not participating in the election.

The majority of voters surveyed were in favour of proportional representation [PR] because they feel cheated by the distortions of our current system (currently in BC), which always under-represents third parties (except for regional parties) and often over-represents the party forming government.

Electing an accountable government, a government that truly represents voters, is not a sport. It's not about winners and losers. We are selecting representatives from our communities and indicating what values (platforms) we prefer.

Because voting needs to set an agenda (platform) as well as select representatives that we respect for their ability to represent all constituents, we need two votes.

MMP is the best system of voting because it allows voters more flexibility and will increase the diversity of views in the government. There will be more interest in the elections when voters don't feel like winners and losers.

The current system with its winners and losers, encourages strategic voting. This situation gives the media and advertisers undue sway over voting behaviour.

The current system of winners and losers ramps up the pressure during election campaigns giving rise to extremely partisan and brutal tactics. Friends are pitted against friends and the community is left with a bad taste in its mouth.

Under proportional representation (MMP), every vote will count towards party representation, so the need for all-out war will not be as beneficial. Also, fear tactics will not be so successful.

Better representation of all parties and the probability of cooperation within government will hopefully usher in more reasonable and respectful campaigns so voters can make better decisions and elected representatives can work together after the election.

The Broad Coalition surveys also heard very strongly that voters are disgusted with the behaviour of members in parliament. Adversarial politics turns people off. Many people don't vote because they can't be bothered with the nonsense.

There is a real need to address the childish and adversarial behaviour of the people we pay large sums of money to for their service. This is outside the mandate of the Citizen's Assembly, but I believe that better representation through MMP could be the first step in giving the electorate the kind of government we deserve.

This is not a sport, it is very serious business. We want to see the best decisions coming from our government, even if it takes longer. Good decisions last longer.

We want to thank you for reading our proposal. We will continue to survey the public up until the next election. This is one way that we are promoting greater participation in our democracy.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy