SUBMISSIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Members of the public sent to the Assembly a total of
1,603 public submissions during the 13 months ended 27
September 2004. And you can access them all lower down on this
page.
Incidentally, the numbers on the submissions appear to show that
there are 1,669 of them. After allowing for blanks, duplications
and those submissions that were later withdrawn by the people who
sent them, the real total is 1,603. Unfortunately, we cannot
renumber the submissions to reflect that.
If a posted submission is dated after 27 September, that date
refers to the date the submission was processed and posted to the
website, not the date it was received.
To help you navigate through the 1,603 submissions received from
the public, here are:
-
An introduction to the submissions, available as a Word
document (40KB) or as a PDF
document (110KB).
-
A link to the
View Submissions page, where you can read and/or search 1,603
submissions
-
A complete list of the submissions and their abstracts,
available as an Excel
spreadsheet (472KB) or as a
PDF (348KB)
-
A guide to the longer submissions (i.e., 80 submissions that run
four or more pages in length). This guide is available as a Word
document (36KB) or as a PDF
file (96KB).
-
A list of the 80 longer submissions, indexed by electoral system
and including abstracts. This list is available as an Excel
spreadsheet (40KB) or as a PDF
item (90KB).
Submission List
To read a submission in full, click on the submitter's name/number
|
Sort by Submission Date | Sort by Last Name
|
Now, a large numbers of the voters are not being
represented by the party of their
choice and voters of different parties are
not being fairly represented. Some sort of proportional
representation [PR] is desperately needed here. [1
page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Anne and Amy Thompson
Date: Sep 01, 2004
|
A comment on problems with AV and compulsory voting.
[1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: E E Rempel
Date: Sep 01, 2004
|
Both of us are long-time and strong supporters of a voting
system that would result in governments that reflect more or less
accurately the wishes of the electorate. MMP seems to
us to come closest to the ideal form for BC. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Johanna Havelaar-Van Halst and W Just Havelaar
Date: Sep 01, 2004
|
MMP will improve democracy in BC. More voices will
be heard; more compromise and less yoyo politics will
result. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Joan Payne
Date: Sep 01, 2004
|
Four reasons why MMP should be adopted in BC: everyone should
have a voice; legislation should be negotiated; small parties
should have a voice; MMP would help to keep the government
sensitive to the vulnerable in BC. [2 pages]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Cleo Pawson
Date: Sep 01, 2004
|
|