![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - Weekend wrapup26th September, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Assembly building electoral models
Members of the Citizens Assembly on Electoral Reform began on
the weekend in Vancouver to design "ideal models" of potential new
electoral systems that they think could suit British Columbia.
After designing some alternative model systems, the members will
pick what they see as the best, and then compare its pluses and
minuses with those of the current "First Past the Post" electoral
system.
And on the weekend of October 23-24, they expect to settle on
their recommendation to the B.C. public: Vote on a new system, or
stick with the one we have.
Members brainstormed on the weekend a
Single Transferable Vote (STV) model, re-engineering a system
used in Ireland. They will shift in the next meetings (in Vancouver
October 16-17) to
mixed systems, of which several varieties are used throughout
the world.
As chair Jack Blaney put it: "Nothing is decided until
everything is decided."
STV aims to make the legislature more "proportional", with each
party's share of seats roughly reflecting its share of the popular
vote. If STV were adopted, geographical constituencies in B.C.
would be larger, but with two or more MLAs per riding.
Voters would rank candidates in the voters’ order of
preference by numbering the candidates on the STV ballot (1, 2, 3,
etc.) The ballots are then counted in a way that aims to ensure
that the candidates with the highest preferences are elected.
By consensus, the Assembly members proposed 2-3 MLAs for
Northern and remote ridings, and as many as seven in dense urban
areas. Riding boundaries would have to be redrawn by a provincial
boundaries commission.
Some Northern Assembly members expressed strong concern about
their already large ridings becoming even bigger, and said this
could further weaken local representation by MLAs. Some other
members suggested that having two or more MLAs could actually
improve local representation, as voters would have more regional
members to call about concerns and issues.
One proposal aired was for a hybrid system, with STV in more
populated multi-member ridings, and a simpler system in
single-member rural ridings. A majority of members turned thumbs
down on that, with several objecting that it would "create two
classes of voters".
What would STV ballots look like? Members said candidates' names
should be grouped under party labels, but that the names would be
in random order rather than alphabetical. And the random order
would rotate, so that no candidate would always get the favoured
No. 1 spot on the ballot. The idea means that more than one version
of the ballot paper would have to be printed for each riding.
STV systems vary in how many candidates the voter must rank. The
Assembly members' model would mean you could vote for one or more.
(Some systems require the voter to rank every candidate on the
ballot, or have the ballot treated as spoiled.)
And what if a vacancy for an MLA arose between general
elections? Assembly members decided that byelections should be held
(rather than going back to the original votes and re-counting
voters' preferences).
Such byelections should use an
Alternative Vote (AV) system, members said. In this, voters
also rank candidates numerically. But then, if no candidate gains
more than 50% of votes on the first count, the second preferences
listed on the ballots of the least successful candidate are
distributed among the remaining candidates. This process continues
until one candidate has a majority of votes.
If in late October members do recommend a new electoral system,
it will be the subject of a referendum for all voters in the May
2005 provincial election. The provincial government says that if
voters approve a change, it would go into effect for the 2009 BC
election. If Assembly members opt to stay with the current system,
then there would be no referendum.
The Citizens' Assembly is an independent, representative,
non-partisan group of 160 randomly selected British Columbians,
plus chair Jack Blaney. They have a deadline of December 15 to
report to British Columbians on their decision, its implications,
and their reasons. Then the Assembly will disband.
Details of the Assembly's schedule and work are at
www.citizensassembly.bc.ca.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |