Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

SUBMISSIONS FROM THE PUBLIC

Members of the public sent to the Assembly a total of 1,603 public submissions during the 13 months ended 27 September 2004. And you can access them all lower down on this page.

Incidentally, the numbers on the submissions appear to show that there are 1,669 of them. After allowing for blanks, duplications and those submissions that were later withdrawn by the people who sent them, the real total is 1,603. Unfortunately, we cannot renumber the submissions to reflect that.

If a posted submission is dated after 27 September, that date refers to the date the submission was processed and posted to the website, not the date it was received. 

To help you navigate through the 1,603 submissions received from the public, here are:
  1. An introduction to the submissions, available as a Word document (40KB) or as a PDF document (110KB).
  2. A link to the View Submissions page, where you can read and/or search 1,603 submissions
  3. A complete list of the submissions and their abstracts, available as an Excel spreadsheet (472KB) or as a PDF (348KB)
  4. A guide to the longer submissions (i.e., 80 submissions that run four or more pages in length). This guide is available as a Word document (36KB) or as a PDF file (96KB).
  5. A list of the 80 longer submissions, indexed by electoral system and including abstracts. This list is available as an Excel spreadsheet (40KB) or as a PDF item (90KB).

Submission List

To read a submission in full, click on the submitter's name/number
Sort by Submission Date | Sort by Last Name

BARRETT-0329

I am in favour of electoral change in this province. I choose the MMP system as I feel that it is a fair system that benefits all citizens of the province. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Helen Barrett
Date: May 07, 2004

BARTOSH AND LISICIN-1466

From the bit of research that we’ve done, it sounds like the type of representational system they have in New Zealand [MMP] might work. It sounds a bit complicated, but it seems to more fairly reflect voters’ intentions. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Glenda Bartosh and Peter Lisicin
Date: Aug 31, 2004

BASAK-0412

No system is absolutely perfect, but the current first past the post system is the most stable system. In a proportional system, the smaller parties will have disproportionately greater and consequently menacingly disruptive power. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system no change
Author: Mr Bijan Basak
Date: May 15, 2004

BATEMAN-0009

An Election Committee should regulate all aspects of the electoral process. [1 page]
Category: Democratic elections
Author: Christopher Andrew Bateman
Date: Nov 13, 2003

BATES-1090

BC should set its course toward Proportional Representation [PR]. I think the preferential plus system is a really bad idea and will split this province even more than it is. Our old majority system clearly does not work anymore. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Alan Bates
Date: Aug 11, 2004

Previous
Page 15 of 321 | Go To Page:
Submissions per page:
Next
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy