Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

SUBMISSIONS FROM THE PUBLIC

Members of the public sent to the Assembly a total of 1,603 public submissions during the 13 months ended 27 September 2004. And you can access them all lower down on this page.

Incidentally, the numbers on the submissions appear to show that there are 1,669 of them. After allowing for blanks, duplications and those submissions that were later withdrawn by the people who sent them, the real total is 1,603. Unfortunately, we cannot renumber the submissions to reflect that.

If a posted submission is dated after 27 September, that date refers to the date the submission was processed and posted to the website, not the date it was received. 

To help you navigate through the 1,603 submissions received from the public, here are:
  1. An introduction to the submissions, available as a Word document (40KB) or as a PDF document (110KB).
  2. A link to the View Submissions page, where you can read and/or search 1,603 submissions
  3. A complete list of the submissions and their abstracts, available as an Excel spreadsheet (472KB) or as a PDF (348KB)
  4. A guide to the longer submissions (i.e., 80 submissions that run four or more pages in length). This guide is available as a Word document (36KB) or as a PDF file (96KB).
  5. A list of the 80 longer submissions, indexed by electoral system and including abstracts. This list is available as an Excel spreadsheet (40KB) or as a PDF item (90KB).

Submission List

To read a submission in full, click on the submitter's name/number
Sort by Submission Date | Sort by Last Name

MCDOWALL-1301

I support the Mixed Member Proportional [MMP] system because it is the most democratic system available to us. It has been extremely successful in New Zealand and I believe Canadians are entitled to the same. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Stephanie McDowall
Date: Aug 13, 2004

LYONS-1300

I am in favour of Mixed Member Proportional Representation [MMP] as the most democratic method of voting for government. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Heather Lyons
Date: Aug 13, 2004

LANE-1299

Please let us catch up with the rest of the democratic world.  Mixed Member Proportional Representation [MMP] is the logical path.  [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: William Lane
Date: Aug 13, 2004

HABGOOD-1298

I believe that the PR system is more democratic and representitive of all the different factors that make up our society.  The first past the post system is too lopsided for it to be a truly democratic system. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Richard Habgood
Date: Aug 13, 2004

DEL VILLANO-1297

The Citizens' Assembly must not show favoritism to PR to the exclusion of our traditional system.  Only if the CA's report is balanced will it be of true value. The test is, will it be understood by voters and result in a wise decision. [2 pages]
Category: Electoral system no change
Author: Gary Del Villano
Date: Aug 13, 2004

Previous
Page 73 of 321 | Go To Page:
Submissions per page:
Next
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy