SUBMISSIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Members of the public sent to the Assembly a total of
1,603 public submissions during the 13 months ended 27
September 2004. And you can access them all lower down on this
page.
Incidentally, the numbers on the submissions appear to show that
there are 1,669 of them. After allowing for blanks, duplications
and those submissions that were later withdrawn by the people who
sent them, the real total is 1,603. Unfortunately, we cannot
renumber the submissions to reflect that.
If a posted submission is dated after 27 September, that date
refers to the date the submission was processed and posted to the
website, not the date it was received.
To help you navigate through the 1,603 submissions received from
the public, here are:
-
An introduction to the submissions, available as a Word
document (40KB) or as a PDF
document (110KB).
-
A link to the
View Submissions page, where you can read and/or search 1,603
submissions
-
A complete list of the submissions and their abstracts,
available as an Excel
spreadsheet (472KB) or as a
PDF (348KB)
-
A guide to the longer submissions (i.e., 80 submissions that run
four or more pages in length). This guide is available as a Word
document (36KB) or as a PDF
file (96KB).
-
A list of the 80 longer submissions, indexed by electoral system
and including abstracts. This list is available as an Excel
spreadsheet (40KB) or as a PDF
item (90KB).
Submission List
To read a submission in full, click on the submitter's name/number
|
Sort by Submission Date | Sort by Last Name
|
I support the Mixed Member Proportional [MMP] system
because it is the most democratic system available to us. It has
been extremely successful in New Zealand and I believe Canadians
are entitled to the same. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Stephanie McDowall
Date: Aug 13, 2004
|
I am in favour of Mixed Member Proportional
Representation [MMP] as the most democratic
method of voting for government. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Heather Lyons
Date: Aug 13, 2004
|
Please let us catch up with the rest of the
democratic world. Mixed Member Proportional
Representation [MMP] is the logical path. [1
page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: William Lane
Date: Aug 13, 2004
|
I believe that the PR system is more democratic and
representitive of all the different factors that make up our
society. The first past the post system is too lopsided
for it to be a truly democratic system. [1 page]
Category: Electoral system change
Author: Richard Habgood
Date: Aug 13, 2004
|
The Citizens' Assembly must not show favoritism to PR
to the exclusion of our traditional system. Only if the
CA's report is balanced will it be of true value. The test is, will
it be understood by voters and result in a wise decision. [2
pages]
Category: Electoral system no change
Author: Gary Del Villano
Date: Aug 13, 2004
|
|