![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
Editorial, The Province17th October, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Voters not equal in current system
The following was the lead editorial in The
Province newspaper, Vancouver, Sunday 17 October 2004.
The very heart of a democracy beats on the strength of the
system citizens use to cast a ballot.
Historically, B.C. has used the first-past-the-post electoral
system, whereby candidates drawing the most votes -- but not
necessarily a majority of votes -- win.
For the most part, this system has delivered stable, majority
governments. But as the province has grown, so have concerns about
the fairness of this system. All too often, a party drawing the
highest popular vote doesn't cinch the most seats in the
legislature. For example, a candidate in a less-populated rural
riding is likely to be elected by fewer votes than one in a dense
urban riding.
The system has also produced its share of majority governments.
Coupled with the restrictions of government party discipline, this
can hamper the freedom of an MLA to cast a vote in the legislature
that reflects the wishes of his or her constituency.
But the way things are is not the way they need to be to ensure
citizens are afforded a democratic vote. Reviewing alternatives to
the current system has been the year-long task of the B.C.
Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform.
The 160-member non-partisan group -- half men, half women --
randomly chosen from the B.C. voters list has almost completed its
assignment. In weeks it will inform Victoria whether it thinks the
current electoral system should be changed and, if so, what the new
system should look like.
If it does recommend a new voting system such a measure will
first be put to referendum in next May's election. A minimum of 60
per cent voter approval in at least 60 per cent of B.C.'s
constituencies is needed to pass. The Liberals have pledged to
legislate the change if the plebiscite succeeds.
The committee has managed to narrow its study of alternatives to
two options -- the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) in which voters
vote for both a local MLA and a preferred party or member-at large,
and the Single Transferrable Vote (STV), whereby voters rank
candidates in order of preference and those candidates with the
highest preferences are elected.
Because it's apt to result in more balance among voter
preferences, we lean toward the MMP system in which a voter selects
a constituency candidate as well as one representing the province
or a larger region within it.
Variations of both systems in the U.K., New Zealand appear to be
working well. Other provinces are also in the process of reviewing
options to electoral reform.
There is a danger, however, that a new voting system will result
in more minority governments and less efficiency in governing.
However, we must keep in mind that voter turnout here and in
other democratic countries continues to sag. The reason? Citizens
are convinced their votes don't matter any more.
But as it stands in B.C., voters are not equal. If a new voting
system can address this imbalance without hindering the legislative
process, then it's worth putting to a referendum.
[© 2004
The
Vancouver Province
. Reproduced here by permission of
The Province.]
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |