![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News Release: Weekly review of hearings5th June, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Support widespread for mixed
system
With the devil certainly in the detail, dozens of
British Columbians told members of the Citizens' Assembly on
Electoral Reform their individual visions for how to improve BC's
electoral system.
Students and a number of younger presenters were
among those joining the chorus for change during hearings in
Sechelt and Abbotsford today and earlier this week in Surrey,
Coquitlam, North Vancouver and Whistler.
Five grade 11 and 12 students from Rockridge
Secondary School, West Vancouver, tackled the issue of voter
alienation Wednesday night in North Vancouver. Under their proposal
for a mixed electoral system, 50 per cent of seats in the
Legislature would be allocated to local representatives elected
under a majority system using a preferential ballot. The remaining
seats would be chosen using a proportional system.
At the same hearing, SFU student Tom Cornwall
warmed to a similar theme, suggesting that strict party control of
MLAs voting patterns made voters feel "local representation is
meaningless". Later in the hearing, Chris Shaw added: "What we
really see with youth is that they are voting with their feet; they
are simply not going to the ballot box." And in Whistler Thursday,
Sara Jennings said more youth would vote if they felt their vote
would count and that "the result would somehow resemble their
views."
The need for BC's electoral system to reflect the
diversity of its population, while being simple and easy to
understand was also discussed. In Surrey Monday night, James
Proctor said each registered voter should receive a "voter's guide"
prior to an election to help them select a party and the
candidates.
Several speakers liked the idea of two ballots.
In Sechelt earlier today, Arnett Tuffs said votes for the party
should be decided based upon proportional representation, but said
votes for local candidates be counted using the current
first-past-the-post system. And in Coquitlam Tuesday, Drew
Carmichael said that a mixed member proportional system (MMP) would
be the best choice for BC because it's simple, would allow more
representation for women and minorities and would make voters feel
their votes counted.
Demand for MMP was widespread amongst presenters
at every hearing this week. MMP was given a twist in Whistler,
where Doug Morrison outlined his proposal for fractional voting
– where MLAs’ voting power is weighed
according to the size of their riding. He said it would allow
citizens in ridings of different population sizes to have the same
voting power. In Coquitlam, Stephen Broscoe felt MMP would work in
BC if the seats in the Legislature were increased to 100 from the
current 79.
Consensual - rather than adversarial - government
also scored high marks. Assembly members were told not to fear
coalition, or minority government. Backing MMP, Alison Watt said in
North Vancouver: "We need more views in the Legislature to deal
with complex issues that are facing this province." And in Sechelt,
Alun Woolliams added: "A quick acting government that does not act
in the best interest of the majority is not an effective
government. Coalitions and governments with strong oppositions are
more likely to make more moderate and stable policy decisions with
a broader base of support."
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |