![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - Surrey public hearing1st June, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Diversity and simplicity key
The need for BC’s electoral system to reflect the
diversity of its population while being simple and easy to
understand were among key goals outlined during a packed public
meeting of the Citizens’ Assembly on Electoral Reform
in Surrey Monday night.
"Keep it simple" was a message repeated by more than one speaker
to members. Penny Leclair, who is deaf-blind, spoke of the need for
greater proportionality in the voting system. Fielding questions
with the aid of an interpreter, she advocated Assembly members
consider alternative voting formats in polling stations
– such as providing information in large print and in
Braille. Leclair said this would allow thousands of blind and
partially sighted voters to vote in privacy and "with dignity".
Close to 100 people heard a total of 12 speakers offer their
views.
Surrey resident Alan Webster also requested a simple change: to
a preferential, or alternative, voting system where candidates
would be ranked by the voter on the ballot. He said it would be a
simple change that would be easy for voters to understand.
James Proctor also addressed a desire for voters to understand a
reformed electoral process. He recommended that each registered
voter receive a "voter’s guide" prior to an election to
help them select a party and the candidates in their riding and
find information on the new voting system. He spoke in favour of a
system in which voters would first cast a ballot for a political
party using a proportional voting system, and then choose their
preferred candidate using a single transferable vote.
Wayne Taylor, of Coquitlam, spoke out strongly against both the
current first-past-the-post system and the concept of single member
ridings. He said that while BC’s electoral system was
superior to many other countries, "we have lulled ourselves into a
false sense of security in this province and country with regard to
the kind of democracy that we live in".
In calling for greater proportionality between the popular vote
won by parties and their share of seats in the Legislature, he said
that single-member ridings were "incapable of providing adequate
representation for the diverse interests found within geographic
communities that comprise BC today".
Political analyst Graham Evan MacDonell examined the history of
election results in BC. While evoking the past, he urged Assembly
members "do not go backwards, please go forwards".
In order to "keep the best of the past while evolving into the
future", Nikolas Jeffrey favoured a regional mixed member plurality
system where each voter casts two ballots, one for a candidate in a
riding and one for the party of their choice. He said the province
would be divided into four regions, with two-thirds of seats in
each region made up of standard electoral districts and the
remaining third made up of regional seats decided using
proportional representation.
Greater transparency over policy plans and the elimination of
public campaign advertising for political parties were two of the
suggestions made by student Robert Evans, in his desire to usher in
a "new era of democracy based upon reason".
And Robert Stone, of Cloverdale, suggested staggering polling
day in different communities in BC over a number of years, to avoid
one party enjoying a "clean sweep" of seats on one day.
The idea of adding a ‘None of the above’
selection to the ballot box was floated by John Allan West. This,
he said, would offer voters an alternative when they want to avoid
spoiling their ballot but do not want to vote for any of the
candidates on it. Tom Ashley also discussed such a change.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |