Click for Search Instructions |
||
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - Penticton hearing23rd June, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Better legislature
manners?
The Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) electoral
system was offered Wednesday night, at a public hearing of the
Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform, as a way of cleaning up
behaviour in the B.C. legislature.
Presenter Tom Hoenisch told the hearing in
Penticton that this form of Proportional Representation would raise
the level of debate.
"Have any of you ever seen a typically raucous
debate in that chamber? It often consists of little more than
members hurling personal insults and invective at each other while
trying to score points in the media.
"Now since under ProRep we would we would often
have coalition governments, this would tone down the personal
attacks because the person you are attacking today may be the
person that you have to join with in a coalition after the next
election."
Another presenter advocating MMP, Kevin Barry,
agreed: "All you see is confrontational yelling back and forth, and
not discussing the legislation. . .. (MMP) is more likely to
produce consensus-based government."
Cass Robinson and the Penticton Raging Grannies
(two from Penticton and two from Oliver) also proposed in song that
under MMP "politics will moderate here in our own B.C."
Two members of the audience of 73, who have seen
Proportional Representation systems in action, begged to
differ.
Errol Anderson, who has voted under MMP in
Scotland, told members: "It does not improve the level of debate.
You still get the partisan stuff."
And Fergus Stewart said that in Northern Ireland
under another PR system "they just can't get along in the
legislature at all. . . . It makes for great TV."
But both said MMP should work in B.C. and would
be an improvement on the current first-past-the-post electoral
system.
Under Hoenisch's version of MMP, the legislature
would be cut from 79 seats to 72. Half the members would be elected
in constituencies that coincide with the 36 federal ridings in B.C.
The other 36, from lists made public by the parties in advance,
would be allocated seats to ensure that each party's share of seats
in the house reflected its share of the province-wide popular
vote.
"The most important fundamental benefit is that
the people of B.C. will finally have a legislature that truly
reflects the wishes of the voters," said Hoenisch. "The tyranny of
the Left and of the Right will be broken."
As a side-benefit, said Hoenisch: "This would be
cheaper, as you'd have fewer MLAs, and, using the same electoral
boundaries, one (boundary) commission could do the work of
two."
Earlier, Barry conceded that MMP, with a
legislature unchanged in size, would mean some larger ridings. "But
sometimes you've got to give something to get
something."
While Hoenisch spoke of reducing the number of
seats to 72, Brigid Kemp of the B.C. Communist Party proposed it be
increased to 100, with 50 elected in constituencies and 50 through
MMP. But their salaries should be cut, she said, so they earn the
average annual B.C. income, plus reasonable expenses.
Another public hearing, with a separate team of
Assembly members, was held Wednesday night in Sparwood. The 50th
and last of the hearings (held all over B.C. in May and June) is in
Kelowna tonight (Thursday).
Details on these hearings are on the Assembly's
website at www.citizensassembly.bc.ca. So is information on how to
make a presentation at the Kelowna hearing, or to send in a written
submission.
The Citizens' Assembly is an independent,
representative, non-partisan group of 160 randomly selected British
Columbians. They must decide by December 15 whether to propose a
change to BC's electoral system. If they recommend a change, it
will be the subject of a referendum for all voters in the May 2005
provincial election.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by levelCMS | Site Map | Privacy Policy |