![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - Williams Lake hearing19th June, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Cure for voter
apathy?
Proportional Representation was offered as a cure
for voter apathy by two speakers at a public hearing Saturday, in
Williams Lake, of the Citizens' Assembly on Electoral
Reform.
Pat Adams said: "The current 'first past the
post' (electoral) system is outdated and has created voter apathy.
For example, in 2000, the voter turnout for the general election
was only 61.2% of those eligible to vote.
"It is my contention that this is symptomatic of
a population who has become disillusioned with voting primarily for
a 'winner take all' party rather than an individual who would more
truly represent their region and specific interests in the
legislature."
And presenter John Pickford added: "I suggest
that PR counters voter apathy and the fear of a wasted vote, which
creates a disincentive to voting. We have lousy turnout, federally
and provincially. I've read statistics from Europe where they get
70-90% turnout. That's where it should be."
Adams also offered PR as a means of ensuring
women are better represented in numbers in the
legislature.
"Currently in British Columbia, women only hold
19 of 79 seats. Clearly, then, something needs to be done to ensure
that women are more adequately represented.
"Advocates of Proportional Representation see it
not only as a more equitable system for women but also for minority
groups and voters in general. Comparisons of electoral systems
indicate that it is the most important variable for the
representation of women and minority groups."
Bruce Mack endorsed a Mixed Member Proportional
system, with mathematical formulas applied to the vote counts to
ensure that MLAS who make it to the House are those with the
highest level of voter support in their home areas.
The formulas would divide the candidate's margin
of victory, or loss, by the number of voters in the riding. Winners
would be determined by the ensuing ratios, not merely by who got
the most votes.
Tom Salley also backed PR, but (like Adams and
Pickford) did not specify any particular model.
"For me the best democracy is one that . . .
creates healthy communities, communities of inclusion, synergy and
understanding. The best form of democracy is the one that
facilitates a voice for everyone in the decision-making process. To
achieve the highest probability of that happening will require a
form of democracy that includes proportional
representation."
Victor Young pleaded with Assembly members to
ensure that whatever system they recommend for B.C. will not
further erode the power of people in rural ridings.
As urban areas grow, and rural populations
shrink, he said, the urban dwellers become ever more dependent on
the rural areas for food and resources.
"(But) the more indispensable our rural people
become, the less say they have in how they are governed. . . .
Vancouver, the Lower Mainland, our capital, are all in the
southwest corner of the province and isolated from the rest of
B.C."
Another public hearing, with a separate team of
Assembly members, was held Saturday in Ganges on Salt Spring
Island. The next hearings are in Vernon and Cranbrook on Monday
night, followed by Revelstoke and Radium on Tuesday, Penticton and
Sparwood on Wednesday and Kelowna (the last of 50 public hearings)
on Thursday.
Details on these hearings are on the Assembly's
website at www.citizensassembly.bc.ca. So is information on how to
make a presentation at a hearing, or to send in a written
submission.
The Citizens' Assembly is an independent,
representative, non-partisan group of 160 randomly selected British
Columbians. They must decide by December 15 whether to propose a
change to BC's electoral system. If they recommend a change, it
will be the subject of a referendum for all voters in the May 2005
provincial election.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |