![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - Maple Ridge public hearing19th May, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
“BC could be so much
better”
William Walsh blamed the costs of dramatic policy changes
instituted by successive governments – what he called
the “yoyo effect" – for the province not
living up to its tremendous natural potential.
“We can be so much better,” he
said. “We can be so much
more.”
Walsh suggested part of the solution might lie in an electoral
system designed to achieve greater proportionality.
“The long-term vision of this province is lost with the
pendulum effect,” he said. “If we had some
of the smaller parties in the legislature, they might be able to
raise a voice of reason.” This, he
suggested, would create a moderating effect and produce a long term
vision for the province.
Robert Hornsey also identified swings in government policy as a
costly consequence of the current electoral system.
While favouring more proportionality, he advised the Assembly to
retain local representation.
“Let’s not throw out the baby with the bath
water… Let’s keep the good things that
work.”
Rick Benoit implored the Assembly “to think outside
the box.” His proposal relied
on computers which would allow people to vote on any issue at any
time. He also suggested people should be able to vote
for anyone they wished; the list of candidates would include
everyone in the country willing to let their name stand
“as long as they were
Canadian.” Furthermore, people
should be able to change their vote at any time, in effect
withdrawing their proxy from one representative and giving it to
someone else. The voting power of the representative
would be proportionate to the number of votes, or proxies, he or
she held.
While Robert Prince said he was all in favour of proportional
representation, he didn’t care as much which
kind. Telling the Assembly that this was a
“once-in-a-lifetime chance,” he admonished
them to take the opportunity to fix the electoral system.
“The Citizens’ Assembly is the most
exciting development that I’ve heard of in politics in
the last 100 years,” Bruce Edwards stated.
He too supported a more proportional system which also incorporated
local representatives.
While most who spoke favoured greater proportionality in the
electoral system, concerns were raised about the possible
proliferation of parties in the legislature, barriers to
independent candidates and party hacks populating the lists of
candidates. Others stated that they wanted to retain
local representatives.
The next hearing will be Thursday (May 20) in Langley at the
Hampton Inn, 19500 Langley Bypass, starting at 6:30pm.
A full schedule of hearings, as well as information on how to sign
up to make a presentation, is on the Assembly’s website
at www.citizensassembly.bc.ca.
The Assembly is an independent, representative, non-partisan
group of 160 randomly-selected British Columbians. They must decide
by December 15 whether to propose a change to BC’s
electoral system. If they recommend a change, it will be the
subject of a referendum for all voters in the May 2005 provincial
election.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |