![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - Chilliwack public hearing18th May, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Election by random selection
A proposal for B.C.'s MLAs to be elected through a random
process was outlined Tuesday to members of the Citizens' Assembly
on Electoral Reform, at a public hearing in Chilliwack.
Olaf Frost of Chilliwack suggested random selection as the key
step in an electoral system of pure Proportional Representation,
with B.C. having 50 seats in the Legislature instead of the current
79, and no constituencies as such.
"A party would get a seat for each of the nearest 2% of the
votes it won. At the time of voting, each person who
was willing to serve as an MLA would be required to show the usual
qualifications, plus that he or she was a member in that party, and
had voted for that party. . . .
"He would not be guaranteed a seat, because his name would go
into a province-wide pool for his party. The day after the voting,
the election supervisor would pull all of each party's seat winners
from the pools. . . MLAs could pick the premier and the cabinet
among themselves, and voting would be mandatory, by telephone if
they weren't in the House."
MLAs would no longer represent local constituencies,
but government information-and-access offices would be
placed in all areas.
Several presenters and members of the audience called for more
proportionality in the electoral system. Audience members also
called for changes (few within the mandate of the Assembly) such as
less party control over MLAs, tighter regulation of election
financing, implementation of a maximum two-year term for premiers,
and democratic mechanisms through which voters would set the
agendas for politicians.
Ted Westlin of Agassiz, a municipal councillor for Kent
district, won audience applause when he called for more free votes
in the legislature. "Pity the poor MLA. They (the government) close
down a local hospital and they close down a local school, and he's
supposed to vote the party line?"
Doug Carson of Rosedale got a hand from the audience when he
said: "Our parties strongly resemble nothing so much as two
junkyard dogs snarling over a torn seat cover, and I have the
horrible feeling I'm the seat cover. Proportional Representation
should provide a little bit of disparate thinking. We're trapped
now. We've got two choices, and that means no choices."
Raymond Smith of Chilliwack proposed that B.C. continue with its
current First Past the Post electoral system - but add a new twist:
an Oath of Obligations that would have to be sworn and adhered to
by MLAs. Smith's oath would include a requirement that MLAs be
bound by an official "standing mandate" filed with the chief
electoral officer by each party. The mandate would spell out the
party's agenda and plans, and include costs in some
cases. The mandate could be altered only by an 80% vote
in the House.
Gil Caffyn of Chilliwack proposed that ballots allow voters to
check off "None of these candidates are acceptable to
me." If a majority so voted, "you go back for a
re-vote. It would be a message to the parties to smarten up in
their selection of candidates."
Other meetings this week are in Maple Ridge on Wednesday
(6:30-9:30pm at Thomas Haney School, 23000 116th Avenue) and in
Langley on Thursday (6:30-9:30pm at the Hampton Inn, 19500 Langley
Bypass.)
A full schedule of hearings, as well as information on how to
sign up to make a presentation, is on the Assembly's website at
www.citizensassembly.bc.ca.
The Assembly is an independent, representative, non-partisan
group of 160 randomly selected British Columbians. They must decide
by December 15 whether to propose a change to BC's electoral
system. If they recommend a change, it will be the subject of a
referendum for all voters in the May 2005 provincial election.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |