Click for Search Instructions |
||
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - New Westminster public hearing7th May, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Assembly hears first defence of status quo
Presenter Terry Julian passionately defended BC’s
existing electoral system at the Citizens’
Assembly’s public hearing in New Westminster Thursday
night.
BC’s single-member plurality system tends to produce
majority governments, he argued, which gives government clear
authority. He contrasted this to proportional
representation, which he said creates multi-party and coalition
governments that “are messy, quarrelsome, inefficient
and ineffective.”
Several others incorporated variations of proportional
representation in their proposals. Harold
Daykin’s mixed member proportional (MMP) system
proposed a “very small dose of proportional
representation,” with some seats filled by losing
candidates in electoral district races running under the banner of
the parties needing “top-up”
seats.
Robert Broughton advocated party-controlled lists in his version
of MMP – a concept explicitly opposed by
Daykin. David Lane, also a supporter of MMP, introduced
the idea of an “electoral audit commission”
that would provide annual reports of parties actions relative to
their electoral platforms.
Saying MMP leads to too much party control, John Vegt advocated
what he called Preferential Plus, a system that uses a preferential
ballot province-wide, while maintaining single-member districts in
less populated regions and multi-member electoral districts in
urbanized areas. Lamenting wild swings in government
policy in BC, he attributed this to “the arrogance of
majority rule without the majority support form the
voters”
The remaining speakers – John West, Charles Boylan,
Guy Duperreault and Don DeMill – were united in their
opposition to political parties. While some of their
proposals incorporated the existing electoral system, others
advocated eliminating elections altogether.
Duperreault maintained that “the problem with
elections is elections. The reality of the
electioneering process is that it gets the wrong people into
power.” He advocated instead a random
selection of legislative representatives via a process similar to
that of the Citizens’ Assembly or jury
duty.
The next public hearings are in White Rock and Valemount
– both Saturday afternoon (May 8).
Next week, hearings will held in the North and in the West
Kootenay regions of the province.
A full schedule of hearings, and information on how to sign up to make a presentation, is on the Assembly’s website at www.citizensassembly.bc.ca. The Assembly is an independent, representative, non-partisan
group of 160 randomly selected British Columbians. They must decide
by December 15 whether to propose a change to B.C.’s
electoral system. If they recommend a change, it will be the
subject of a referendum for all voters in the May 2005 provincial
election.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by levelCMS | Site Map | Privacy Policy |