![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News release - Courtenay hearing26th May, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
History recalled in bid to shape
future
An overflow audience of over 100 in Courtenay
Wednesday heard a number of speakers preface calls for change to
B.C.’s electoral system by recalling the historical
roots of our democracy.
Drawing lessons from different societies and
different periods, the speakers concluded at a public hearing of
the Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform that change is
needed.
Bill Peters, a reference librarian in
B.C.’s legislature for 24 years, told
Citizens’ Assembly members that the imposition of party
solidarity in B.C. in the early part of the 20th century has
stifled debate of issues and created an adversarial
system.
In a history lesson from ancient Greece, Angus
Ramsey recounted the creation of the first citizens’
assembly in Attica in 594 BC. Addressing the Assembly members, he
said: "I’m praying that this Citizens’
Assembly will be the seed to revitalize our democracy."
Recalling the roots of B.C.’s current
first-past-the-post electoral system in the British parliamentary
system, Ralph Keller went on to recount the evolutions that system
has undergone. "When we look at history," he concluded, "we see
that there is nothing unusual about evolution in the democratic
process."
"Tinkering with our beloved democratic process is
a weighty matter," Keller said, but added: "It is clear to me that
in order to save our beloved democratic system, it needs to
change."
Also harking back to 19th century England, John
Wood stated: "Although the character of society and the concepts of
democracy have greatly changed since then the voting system has
remained virtually the same over the last 100 plus years. . . .The
old first-past-the-post system . . . is not suitable for modern
democratic society."
Many speakers spoke in support of the mixed
member proportional representation system (MMP). Among them,
20-year-old Eric Brown said his vision of the kind of province he
wants to live and vote in is "one where I am confident that my
values are represented within the government. . . . Proportional
representation facilitates the creation of policies that reflect
the interests of a larger segment of society."
Gwyn Frayne and Barb Berger, representing the
Comox Valley Chapter of the Council of Canadians, told the hearing:
"It is our contention that we need to build into any electoral
reform some guarantees that ensure accountability, multi-cultural
diversity, rural representation, and incentives for voting by young
adults and the largely under-represented poor."
One audience member urged the Assembly to
consider the impact of any new electoral system on the business
community, saying that business can adapt to anything but
instability. Another expressed a preference for a system that would
require candidates to be elected by a majority of voters through
preferential ballots. And two others felt that the problem lay not
with the electoral system, but with parties.
Other ideas included:
The next public hearings are in Nanaimo on
Thursday (May 27) and Vancouver on Saturday (May 29).
A full schedule of hearings – as well
as information on how to sign up to make a presentation
– is on the Assembly’s website at
www.citizensassembly.bc.ca.
The Assembly is an independent, representative,
non-partisan group of 160 randomly selected British Columbians.
They must decide by December 15 whether to propose a change to
BC’s electoral system. If they recommend a change, it
will be the subject of a referendum for all voters in the May 2005
provincial election.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |