![]() | ![]() ![]() | ![]() Click for Search Instructions |
Home > News & Events |
|
News release8th February, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Assembly probes voting systems
Members of BC's Citizens' Assembly on Electoral
Reform just concluded their third weekend of meetings at which they
examined in detail two of the five major families of electoral
systems, plurality and majority systems, and heard from a leading
expert on why voters vote – or not.
In their next round of meetings –
February 21 and 22 in Vancouver – Assembly members will
focus on the remaining three types of electoral systems used in
various democracies around the world: proportional representation
systems, single transferable vote systems and mixed
systems.
While early electoral systems were mainly based
on the plurality principle, during the 19th century, majority
systems became more popular. Proportional representation systems
were widely adopted in the early part of the 20th century
– often at the time the right to vote was being
expanded. They were seen as a way of ensuring that no one group
would be able to capture a majority. In the last decade of the 20th
century, there was a sudden revival of interest in electoral system
change – with much of the focus on proportional and
mixed systems.
In evaluating electoral systems, suggested
UBC political science professor Ken Carty, the Assembly should
consider the impact of each system on the working of government,
how political parties would function and how voters would respond.
"We need to think about what kind of politics we want in BC.
It’s the answers to these kinds of questions that
should drive the decisions regarding what kind of electoral system
we want."
The fundamental principle of majority
systems is that the winning candidate must obtain over 50% of the
vote. This may mean, when there are more than two candidates, some
process for eliminating the least popular candidates and
redistributing their votes to the remaining candidates
– either through a second round of voting or through a
system where voters rank candidates on the ballot in order of
preference.
"A problem with majority systems is that you
don’t always get the most chosen candidate, but rather
the least disliked," joked political scientist Campbell Sharman in
addressing the Assembly.
British Columbia’s electoral
system is a plurality system – the system currently in
use throughout Canada, both federally and
provincially.
In plurality systems, individual candidates
seek election in their electoral district and the winning candidate
in each district is the one with the most votes – even
if they get less than 50 per cent of voter support. This can result
in such anomalies as a party achieving sufficient seats to form a
majority government with less of the popular vote than the
opposition party – as happened in BC in 1996. Plurality
systems, however, do result in stable governments, electoral
accountability and strong constituency
representation.
Guest speaker and renowned expert on voter
behaviour, André Blais from the University of Montreal,
told the Assembly that the decline in voter turnout is a world-wide
phenomenon. Research has lead Blais to conclude that the major
cause of this decline among younger citizens is the weakening sense
that voting is not just a right but a civic duty. "Older adults,
even if they are cynical and uninterested in politics, feel it is
their duty to vote. That sentiment is weakening in younger
generations."
"Don’t be too confident," Blais
cautioned the Assembly, "that electoral reform will be the cure for
declining voter turnout."
Assembly member Tom Townrow, aged 23,
observed that, among his friends, those who voted were those who
discussed issues around the dinner table with their
families.
Blais also noted that the research points to
the effectiveness of old-style door-to-door campaigning in
increasing voter turnout.
Members peppered Blais with questions, such
as:
On Saturday, the Assembly decided
to hold an extra-ordinary meeting immediately following the 49
public hearings (to be held throughout the province during May and
June) to review and discuss what they had heard from British
Columbians. Assembly members voted by an overwhelming majority to
hold this meeting in Prince George.
All other meetings of the Assembly
are held in Vancouver at the Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue at
580 West Hastings Street in downtown Vancouver and are open to the
public on a "first-come, first-seated" basis.
In a series of six weekend
meetings from January through March, Assembly members are learning
about electoral systems and the political and legislative context
in which they operate. Following the public hearings and the
meeting in Prince George, they will reconvene for up to five
weekends of deliberation in the fall.
Assembly members must decide by
December 15 if they will propose a change to BC’s
current system of translating votes into seats in the Legislature.
If they recommend a change, it will be the subject of a referendum
for all voters in the 2005 provincial election. Any change approved
by the voters would take effect with the 2009 BC
election.
The Assembly's 160 members
– 80 men and 80 women – were randomly
selected from the voters’ list and come from all
regions of the province.
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by ![]() | Site Map | Privacy Policy |