Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission SETO-1620 (Online)

Submission By David Seto
AddressMontréal, Québec,
Organization
Date20040830
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
I propose a majority system (50% + 1) whereby a candidate to be elected must get at least 50% + 1 of the votes that represent 50% + 1 of the riding's voters list. [2 pages]

Submission Content

Abstract: I propose a majority system (50% + 1) whereby a candidate to be elected must get at least 50% + 1 of the votes that represent 50% + 1 of the riding's voters' list.

Previously, I submitted for your consideration a proposal that among called for:

  1. a uniformisation as much as possible of the population size of all ridings by reducing the deviance presently set by the Electoral Boundaries Commission Act from 25% to a much lower level, and
  2. a turnout threshold of any level (i.e., 50%, 60%, 66%, etc...) in a majority system (50% + 1 of the votes) that must be met to validate the riding election.
Afterwards, I promote this concept with my peers and that key concern that emerged was that a situation would likely arise whereby a candidate that can get 50% + 1 of the votes to win, but his/her opponents can deny that victory purposefully or inadvertently by not being successful in turning out the vote. Much much reflexion and discussion, I have decided to submit the following proposal.

A majority system (50% + 1) of the votes that must be 50% + 1 of the riding's voters' list. This means that independently of the turnout to validate the election, the winning candidate must have obtained the votes of at least half of the voters eligible to vote. Assuredly, with the vote of the other candidates, the turnout will be greater than 50%. Furthermore, this means uncontestably that each candidate elected to the legislature in this manner has been supported by at least half of the voters (and is a strong and widely supported candidate), not just half of those who voted. Ridings that fail to have elected a member in this way can do so 1 week later with the top candidates with the same rules. Those ridings failing to elect a member after a second try will either: 1) have a by-election a few months later, or 2) have no representation for the duration of the legislative term.

For example, under a simple majority system of 50% + 1 of the votes with a turnout of 80%, the winner actually got a 40% + 1 support from the riding's voters. In the method that I propose, the winner must get 50% + 1 of voters' list, and with a hypothetical turnout of 80%, the winner would have obtained 62.5% of the votes cast.

Thank you for allowing me to present my ideas to you.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy