Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission PINEY-0859 (Online)

Submission By David Piney
AddressVictoria, BC,
Organization
Date20040714
CategoryDemocratic government
Abstract
The electoral mandate is sacred and compels the government to abide thereto. The significant remedial potential of this general precept should be fully explored by the Assembly, including the full multitude of possible variations. [1 page]

Submission Content
My interest in electoral reform springs from sociological concerns and the predictable effect of having the elite determine the public's fate. Were the public responsible for deciding the general moral direction of the nation there'd be no fear-of-strangers programming, no overt militarization of women, no cooperation in preemptive wars of imperialism disguised as peacemaking, no domestic rise of police state fascism with its vast covert army of vigilante informants all of which are unfolding today in Canada in order to appease the personal interests of the privileged. And it's simply because the public has the common sense to know that it's the inevitable victim of these raw expediency strategies, which the elite are all too willing to impose on them.

The electoral system must provide a more fail-safe mechanism to protect the nation from representatives who make spurious election promises that they have no intention of keeping. Such ease in usurping the checks and balances of the collective conscience that's offered by democracy jeopardizes our very sovereignty, and even humanity itself. The Westminster system's Salisbury Protocol recognizes the sanctity of the electoral mandate and compels the government to abide thereto. The significant remedial potential of this general precept should be fully explored by the assembly, including the full multitude of possible variations.

Thus I hope the assembly will realize the importance of this issue and how their mandate could be used as an historically rare opportunity for solution. Their assessment of models for electing members of the Legislative Assembly is limited to the manner by which voters' ballots are translated into elected members. And I propose the manner the ballots are translated into elected members is in the form of a binding contractual mandate, which I've expounded in my presentation. Though it seems I'm levering a play on words, the meaning is valid, and the Westminster system's Salisbury Protocol recognizes the obligation of the mandate. Why not shift the balance of power to the public in an expression of true democracy, enabled by a contractual mandate system? The assembly's courage and determination to make this happen could well herald a new age that's governed by the collective conscience of humanity instead of elitist self interest.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy