Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission HAYES-0888 (Online)

Submission ByMr Stephen Hayes
AddressNew Westminster, BC,
Organization
Date20040723
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
Four key issues are important in choosing a new system: proportionality; decreasing the power of political parties; increasing the power of MLAs; and allowing for local representation. [2 pages]

Submission Content

Here are my suggestions for a new electoral system for British Columbia.

I would like to see BC move to some kind of proportional voting system in order to prevent the kind of dramatic swings in government that we have seen over the past few decades. This would also allow more parties to win seats in the legislature, so that the political views of British Columbians would be more fairly represented.

Four key issues would be important to me in choosing a new system. The first would be to increase proportionality and voter choice while at the same time keeping a stable government. The second would be to increase the power of the voters (and decrease the power of the political parties). The third would be to increase the power of the MLAs (and decrease the power of the government). The final key issue would be to allow for local representation.

Other issues, such as maintaining an easily understandable electoral system or increasing the representation of minority groups in the legislature, are of less importance to me. No system is perfect. I would accept a system in which compromises were made in these areas in order to achieve gains in the four areas that I feel are the most important.

In order to address my four key issues we would need a mixed system. I would suggest a double mixed system of single-member rural districts and multi-member urban districts that was also a mixed member proportional system. The single-member rural districts would allow for local representation and the MMP aspect would restore the proportionality.

I see two possibilities. My first choice would be a Majority/PR-STV // PR-Closed List system with each voter allowed one vote. Rural districts would be Majority and urban districts would be PR-STV. The seats would be topped-up using PR-Closed List. This latter function could be done using the province as one big district, which would provide the most proportionality, or by dividing the province into 6-8 large areas, which would increase local representation. My second choice would be a Plurality/PR-Open List // PR-Closed List system with each voter allowed two votes, one for the MLA and one for the party.

The downsides of both of these systems are that they are extremely complex and they create two kinds of MLAs. To reduce the complexity while keeping the most proportionality (but less local represenation) I would suggest an MMP system. My first choice would be a Majority // PR-Closed List system with one vote. My second choice would be a Plurality // PR - Closed List system with two votes.

To reduce the complexity and eliminate the problem of two kinds of MLAs, while keeping the most local representation (but less proportionality), I would suggest a system that is simply mixed in different parts of the province. My first choice would be PR-STV/Majority system. My second choice would be a PR-Open List/Plurality system.

All of the systems discussed above are complex and all of them would be new to BC, but I believe that any of them would be a vast improvement over the current system. Details such as the number of districts, the boundaries of districts, and the number of seats per multi-member district could be fine-tuned over time, while keeping the basic structure.

Thank you for your time.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy