Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission CROCKETT-0813 (Online)

Submission By Bob Crockett
AddressCoquitlam, BC,
Organization
Date20040709
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
My suggestion is to establish a number of seats that are allocated after the election to better reflect the popular vote. These seats could be additional to the current house or achieved by increasing the size of the current ridings. [2 pages]

Submission Content
I attended the citizen's forum event in Coquitlam and thoroughly enjoyed the process. The arguments were well presented and all comments were  respected, and personal criticism was absent.
 
On my way home I came up with my own variation to the issue and I ask that you post this on your website
 
It seems to me people want to have a local representative but dislike the imbalances that can arise from the 'First Past the Post' system. Minor parties may have general support but can't win in a single riding. Party leaders are sometimes left out of the  house because they failed to win their own seat. Unfortunately, the alternatives start getting very complicated and may scare people away away instead of improving participation.
 
My suggestion is to establish a number of seats that are allocated after the election to better reflect the popular vote. These seats could be additional to the current house or achieved by increasing the size of the current ridings.
 
Here's a quick model:
 
Say there are 100 seats representing 3 million people or one MLA per 30,000 voters.
 
Reduce the number of ridings to 80 so there is one MLA per 37,500 voters.
 
After the election, additional seats are assigned to a maximum of 20 (to keep the total the same) so that the overall balance in the house is closer to the popular vote. In most case these seats would be allocated to the opposition parties and include those minor parties whose popular vote is spread out but not enough to capture a single seat.  The parties would name who gets those seats, so that, for example, party leaders could get in even if they lost their own seat.
 
This would maintain the riding representation format that people like and provide more resources to balance government parties in the house and more importantly on committees. These "MLA's without portfolios" can be assigned to specific research, committees and help with riding representation.
 
Clearly, this requires an agreement in advance to the formula as the distribution of extra seats may affect the outcome of a close election.
 
The main advantages are that voters will still have a local MLA and the voting process does not change or become complicated. Those who support minor parties will feel their vote will counts because of the new "popular vote' seats.
 
Thank you providing this opportunity to contribute. Keep up the good work.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy