Submission BUTT-1592 (Online)
|
Submission By | David Butt |
Address | Creston, BC, |
Organization | |
Date | 20040818 |
Category | Democratic elections, Democratic government |
Abstract
|
I support some type of proportional representation [PR], but
where the MLAs continue to be responsible to us, the voters,
between elections. [2 pages]
|
Submission Content
|
I'd like to thank the members of the Citizens' Assembly for
their efforts in this process. I am also extremely thankful that I
live in a country that allows this level of personal expression and
contribution to our political process.
I have read through a great number of the contributions to this
panel, and am concerned by the many parrotted comments I have read.
As such I will at least try to insert some originality into this
submission.
I am unhappy with our current electoral system of FPTP, which I
believe works best in a two party system. I would therefore support
some type of proportional representation [PR], but where the MLAs
continue to be responsible to us, the voter, between elections. One
method to illustrate this idea is to compare it to a corporation,
or better a co-operative. Consider each vote a share in the
province. Each individual can use his or her share in a number of
ways. They vote in regular elections to select 79 MLAs. They can
use it to participate in referenda to cause the MLAs elected at the
last election to take certain actions. Occasional referenda gives
direct, but limited input into the governance process, as a
referendum would have limited scope.
Between elections the citizen can proxy his or her ballot to any of
the 79 MLAs. This proxy can be transferred to any other MLA at any
time, or at certain periods (say before each session of the
legislature), by written notice to the Legislature. This would
allow the electorate to effectively direct the governance of the
province by giving their proxy to the MLA who best supports their
interests. If an individual continues to be satisfied with the
parlimentary position of their MLA, then they need do nothing until
the next general election. If however, they become dissatisfied
with the position of their MLA, or if they feel that their MLA
changes views, or no longer holds the citizen's views, the proxy
can be transferred. This also allows the citizen who changes their
position on a political matter over time to effect an appropriate
change.
Each MLA votes his or her block of voters.
By this process, or something similar, I believe that a truer
democracy would result, and MLAs would be more responsible to
their, non-geographic constituency.
Further to this, we have to find a way to elect the best people to
our legislature. Our current sturcture requires that an individual
be independently wealthy to enter provincial politics. The stipend
that we pay our politicians for the time and energy the must expend
is ridiculously low. If recollection serves, the Premier earns far
less than the CEO of Provincial Crown Corporations, or Health
Authorities. Our MLAs are paid at a rate commensurate with middle
managers, yet we entrust them with, and expect them to properly
manage, an enterprise with the size and wealth of the Province of
British Columbia. Although this is not part of the Citizens'
Assembly's mandate, it is a necessary part of the reform of our
electoral system, if we as electors expect the best to offer
themselves for public office.
|