Click for Search Instructions |
||
Home > News & Events |
|
News story (Maclean's magazine)21st January, 2004 :
Vancouver (Internal)
Power to the People
Forget the usual suspects. In B.C., regular folks are
tackling electoral reform
By
PAUL
WELLS
Maclean’s
(issue cover-dated January 26, 2004)
IT'S SOMETIMES SAID that democracy makes it possible for
ordinary people to do extraordinary things. It's sometimes said
that any one of us can make a difference. But be serious. How often
do you see it happening?
Actually, it's happening right now in British Columbia.
On Jan. 10 and 11, the face of change gathered in a downtown
Vancouver conference hall, and it could not more completely
resemble the face of your neighbour, because that's precisely what
it is.
The 160 members of the Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform
will spend most of the year trying to find an improvement on the
way governments get elected in B.C. The group's power is
formidable. If a majority of the members decide next autumn that a
new system should be implemented, their choice will be put to a
referendum in the next provincial election in May 2005. Premier
Gordon Campbell cannot stop that vote even if he wants
to — although his B.C. Liberals owe some of
their overwhelming majority to the quirks of the current
system.
But the citizens who have been entrusted with this power are not
hand-picked academics, washed-up party hacks or well-connected
friends of the regime. They were selected through a series of
random draws: one man and one woman from each of B.C.'s 79
provincial ridings, plus two Aboriginal representatives who were
added after random selection failed to turn up anyone from the
First Nations.
One of these guardians of democratic reform is a dog-walker from
North Vancouver. Another manages the sporting-goods department at
the Kelowna Wal-Mart. There is a third-year student at the
University of British Columbia and a man who operates a pet
cemetery.
"The innovation is that non-elected citizens have the power to
make this decision," Jack Blaney, a former president of Simon
Fraser University who is the assembly's appointed chairman, said in
an interview. "We are inventing a new social tool in
democracy."
To watch the citizen-reformers work on the first weekend of
their long year was to witness a stirring rebuttal to the cynicism
that infests so much of Canadian politics and political
journalism.
The participants listened keenly as Ken Carty, a political
science professor at the University of British Columbia, began the
long process of explaining how other countries elect their leaders.
They discussed the options at length in smaller breakout sessions.
The dominant attitudes were mutual respect and a willingness to
question their own assumptions.
"I've never seen such enthusiasm and knowledge from a group of
people that they're doing something novel and useful," Ken
McKinnon, the chancellor of Yukon College, said near the end of the
assembly's first day.
McKinnon's presence in Vancouver is another part of this story.
Because, while the power of ordinary people in the B.C. Citizens'
Assembly is unique, serious electoral reform is being considered in
more than half of the country. The governments of Ontario and
Quebec have started looking into electoral reform. McKinnon was in
Vancouver to take notes as the Yukon's senior adviser on electoral
reform. New Brunswick also sent an observer because Bernard Lord,
the province's premier, has created his own commission on reform of
elections and the legislature. Last month, Norman Carruthers,
Prince Edward Island's retired chief justice, submitted a report
recommending a dose of proportionality so smaller parties will no
longer be swamped by winning parties in elections.
Only a few years ago, electoral reform was a dead issue,
cherished by opposition parties but dismissed by the parties that
benefit from the current system and were, human nature being what
it is, loath to abandon that edge. What changed? "Well, we have
evolved our electoral practices over time," said Bill Cross,
research director for New Brunswick's Commission on Legislative
Democracy. "Just look at the franchise, right? I mean, women
couldn't vote. Up until the 1960s, Native Canadians couldn't vote.
We lowered the voting age in the 1970s."
Recent events have led many Canadians to suspect the system is
due for another mighty tweak. "What's happening at the federal
level, with Paul Martin talking about the democratic deficit, got
people's attention," Cross said. "The decline in turnout is a
substantial ingredient. In New Brunswick we've gone down more than
10 points in recent elections." And the growing legions of
non-voters, Cross said, are disproportionately young. "That's a
real concern."
There is no guarantee the various reform movements will reach
the same conclusion. In fact, it's far likelier they'll disagree.
That's fine, Cross said. "I think it's a great opportunity
federalism provides: that you can have different experiments, if
you will, and we can try different systems."
Deciding how to fix British Columbia's system, or whether
to — B.C. assembly members spent part of
their first weekend reminding themselves they don't have to
recommend a change if they can't find a single better
way — begins with a steep learning curve.
The citizen-reformers will spend a total of six weekends listening
to Carty and experts from abroad tell them about other systems.
These include proportional representation, in which a party that
wins 20 per cent of the vote gets 20 per cent of a legislature's
seats; France's two-round voting system, in which the top two or
three candidates face a second "runoff" election; and all manner of
lists, "transferable votes" and mix-and-match compromises.
Carty calls it the most challenging course he's ever given
because his audience is so diverse and he is so leery of herding
them toward any preferred outcome. "We've got people here who are
keenly interested in politics — and people
who really aren't sure what the legislature is," he said. "How do
you talk to those people without talking down or being
simplistic?"
As for the challenge of teaching without imposing, Carty's
answer is to spend much of his time simply asking questions. Is it
necessary for a member of a legislature to represent a specific
chunk of territory any more? What do you gain in fairness through a
proportional system, and what do you lose in government stability
by abandoning the rules most Canadians are used to?
Every political junkie has favourite answers to questions like
this, but anyone would have been impressed with the assembly
participants' willingness to question any system's assumptions.
Harley Nyen, the Wal-Mart employee from Kelowna, belonged to a
breakout group whose members come from the far corners of British
Columbia and are convinced they can only be represented by somebody
from the local community. He reported back to his colleagues that
he was amazed to hear from another group whose members are mostly
Vancouverites -- and who don't think "regional representivity" is
important at all.
The citizen-reformers greeted every such contradiction, not as
an insult but as a challenge and an opportunity. "I thought I was
one of those strange individuals who thought politics and our
electoral system were important, right?" Nyen said. "But 159 other
people are proving me wrong. Maybe I'm not wasting my time, you
know?"
[Article reproduced here with the permission of
Maclean’s. © Maclean's, 2003]
|
© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform | Site powered by levelCMS | Site Map | Privacy Policy |