Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission VEGT-0062 (Online)

Submission ByMr John Vegt
AddressNew Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Organization
Date20040118
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
A 'Preferential Plus' proportional electoral system should be adopted for BC.  This system uses preferential voting in multimember districts in closely settled areas, but preserves single member districts for northern BC ridings.  [2 pages]

Submission Content
 

Towards a Fair Voting System for BC

Submitted by John Vegt
January 2004

Introduction

The current first past the post electoral voting system in BC is outdated, unrepresentative and most of the time does not result in a government for which voters voted. Not a single country in the last century has chosen this system; not even the eastern European countries in the last decade choosing a new voting system.

If I vote and my vote does not count towards electing anyone, my vote is wasted. I believe British Columbians want their votes to count.

Goals for BC

There are five goals I believe that should guide the Citizens Assembly deliberations:

Broad proportionality

1. Every vote should count equally no matter where you reside in BC
2. The government; whether in coalition or not, must be voted in by a majority of votes
3. A new voting system should avoid legislatures which result in a large majority without have a large majority of the votes
4. Within practical parameters, the number of seat in the legislature should approximate the share of the provincial vote

Voter choice should become more a meaningful exercise

1. The new system should encourage positive voting rather than voting against someone so that someone else does not get in.
2. There should be an opportunity to hold referendums on significant issues at the time of voting members of the legislature

More stability in government

1. There should be a reasonable number of parties with significant overall support
2. Coalitions created by the voting system should be stable
3. There should be less turnover of members of the legislature

Better government

1. The new voting system should reduce extreme polarization experiences of the past
2. There should be a decrease of extreme changes to legislation because of changes of governments which result in uncertainty and instability for government, labour, business and other sectors
3. There should be more accountability to the legislature by the premier
4. Power should be spread more to the legislative members and less to the premier
5. Members of the legislature need to have a more significant role

There needs to be a meaningful link between geographic representation and the member in the legislative assembly

1. A member of the legislative assembly should be identified geographically with voters
2. A member of the legislative assembly needs to be available for local issues

Based on the above broad guidelines I believe there needs to be a mix of both proportional representation and geographic representation. There are a number of voting systems that could achieve both. However, giving the large geographic area of BC and relative small areas of high population concentration there are not many systems that can achieve the five goals reviewed above.

Recommendations

My recommendation to the Citizens Assembly for a made in BC model is similar to the one already recommended by Nick Loenen:  Preferential Plus [See submission 0035].

Under this system the province is divided into geographic clusters in which a voter ranks candidates. These multi-seat districts ensure that the number of seats allocated to parties approximates the party’s popular vote. The geographically very large and mainly northern BC ridings are to continue as single seat ridings. This voting system is not dissimilar to the preferential ballot model used in the 1952 BC Election. The clusters should be large enough (at least five seats) to achieve proportional representation.   

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy