Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission SCLATER-0482 (Online)

Submission By Gordon Sclater
AddressVancouver, BC,
Organization
Date20040526
CategoryDemocratic elections
Abstract
Five aspects of the electoral process should be changed: voting age; 9 year terms; multiple choices for the electorate; continuing voter assessment of MLAs; forfeiture of seats for under-performing MLAs; by-elections for such vacancies. [2 pages]

Submission Content
Reform of the Electoral Process should come in five parts.

  1. Voting age set at 16. This would also include adding political science a requirement in High School Curriculum to run through grades 11 and 12. This is a simple legislative process.
  2. Fixed election terms established at 9 years. This is a simple legislative process. By extending terms to 9 years, it's possible for the Legislature to think and plan long term.
  3. Multiple choices for the electorate. This is achieved by creating zones of 3 electoral districts grouped into one zone. Each zone would include the same number of MLA seats which all the electorate in the zone would be voting to fill. This would mean candidates would have a broader range of electorate political viewpoint to involve in the election process. Likewise this satisfies the immediate issue of increasing voter participation at the beginning of each new term with 3 seats to fill per electorate at election time.
  4. Continual collection of data on how MLAs vote throughout their term of office cross-referenced against data on electorate approval of their votes.  This process is intended to offer the electorate an ongoing incentive to be a part of the parliamentary process throughout the full 9 year term. This process is achieved by creating an electronic methodology by which every MLA is required to register their vote for public referral. At the same time a separate electronic methodology is created by which the electorate in each zone accesses that registry, by SIN number and personal 4 digit secret code, and registers approval or disapproval of their 3 MLAs votes.
  5. MLAs who fail to meet a minimum performance level as per Item.3 at year 3 and 6 through the 9 year term lose their seat and a by-election is held. This performance level is defined by both approval and voter participation to create a driving force for MLAs to conduct serious conferencing with the electorate in their zone before voting to ensure their vote is positive with their electorate and not some artificial party line or personal ideology. This also creates incentive to encourage voter participation. Thus failure to represent the broader electorate throughout their term will cause an MLAs political career to end in as short as 3 years.
NOTE: If the first 2 terms prove a successful model with the electorate generally satisfied with the process as indicated by fewer and fewer by-elections at each 3 year point specified in Item.4, then towards the end of the second term would be a good time to look at eliminating general elections entirely. Since MLAs not supported by their electorate would be removed, and those MLAs who choose to resign would be replaced by the bi-election process general elections would become redundant. Likewise, government would become an ongoing process rather than driven by some arbitrary time frame and remove the election/re-election driver from the mindset of MLAs and their supporters.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy