Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission RESTON-0887 (Online)

Submission By Laura Reston
AddressRichmond, BC, Canada
Organization
Date20040722
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
Changing the makeup of the legislature and how the candidates present themselves in order to get elected is just a first step.  Some modifications to MMP are suggested. [2 pages]

Submission Content
Much has been said in many of the submissions that changes in how government works is the need and that electoral reform isn't really the issue. I believe the point being missed in those submissions is that by changing the makeup of the legistature and how the candidates present themselves in order to get elected is just a first step. The discussion of how to get work done can be opened up with input from representitives of particular points of view which are subsumed in the current system.

Electoral reform which includes a fair amount of proportionality will bring representation of more points of view to the legislature.  While MMP is not my personal preference (see my previous submission Reston 0749) I have an idea of how I would see it done.

1. Single Member Ridings
60-60% of the seats to be elected in single member ridings by some form of preferential ballot system.
No form of FPTP should be retained -- no seat should be awarded with less than a majority. Even though the total number of seats in the legislsture is balanced by PR it doesn't negate the fact that the riding MLA was chosen by less than half of the constituents. Erring on the idea that this portion of the vote should be left unchanged because it is "simple" gives no credit to the people of BC. There are preferential style ballot systems that can be used that are not much more complicated than FPTP. The voter may not need to rank more than one candidate if they are willing to accept the fact that other voters will accept a chance to support a second choise.

2. Proportional Seats
35-40% of the seats to be elected from open party lists with the candidates standing for both a riding and list or just list according to the candidate's will or ability.

Open list seats would mean that all candidates must campaign in some way to influence people to give them votes. A threshold of 4% of votes for a first seat would seem reasonable.

It might be a good idea to create 4-5 reagions for the PR seats so the list candidates are associated with those regions and the constituents in those areas. Though to make a regionalized system work well an increase in total seats to about 100 would be needed.

ADDITIONAL SUGGESTIONS

1. Changes to suggested reform
If the Assembly recommends a new electoral system I think the proposal should include mechanisms of how changes would be made to the system. By this I mean that if the recommended system is sucessful in the referendum the succeding government elected in the provincial vote next May cannot unilaterally make alterations before implementing it nor subsequent governments after the new system is in place. While I realize that alterations may be desired or even necessary changes must not be made without going back to the voters who agreed to the original format.

2.Defining Roles
In order to avoid some of the problems following reform as experienced in New Zealand and Scotland I suggest the Assembly recommend a committee of political parties and citizens be formed in the year before the first election to define how the work of the legislature and constituency serviceing is to be devided between the riding and list MLAs, in effect, job discriptions. Several months before the election with the new format an education process for the potential candidates for the seats and the general population of the province on those decriptions and duties should be started. This should deal with unspoken assumptions of all sides which lead to dissatisfaction and stress. If everyone has some basic idea of what to expect of the new relationships levels of dissatisfaction should be kept to a resonable minimum. It might not take 15 years to know if the change is working.

3. Voter turnout
The recent federal election was a good illustration of the lack of interest of a large proportion of the population in getting out to vote. While a new electoral system might cause a few more people to come to the polls I don't think it would be all that significant. People have gotten out of the habit of voting. We don't even talk about it much among ourselves. As much as I would like people to vote as a personal decision I have come to the conclusion that voting should be made manditory with a fine for noncompliance.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy