Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission PIANTES-0843 (Online)

Submission By Chris Piantes
AddressVernal, Utah, USA
Organization
Date20040713
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
'A better alternative to MMP: Cross-Proportional Representation (CPR)'  [2 pages]

Submission Content
A better alternative to MMP: Cross-Proportional Representation (CPR)

British Columbia's electoral system is in all likelihood going to change, most likely to the New Zealand method of Mixed-Member Proportional elections (MMP). I deem to be the best electoral system (so far) that meets BC's needs.

Nevertheless it is not perfect (half of the seats come from party lists, electorates are twice as large etc.) CPR has all the advantages of MMP while avoiding these defects. This is how it works:

The candidates for election to the Legislature are arranged on a spreadsheet, sorted by electorate (riding) and by party. The votes for each party are totalled and seats allocated in proportion to the party's vote. The votes within each riding are totalled and seats allocated proportionally, in the same way as parties. Multiple-member electorates are possible, but rare unless by design, and some ridings may get no seats; these orphan ridings could be merged with a neighbor.

CPR works by requiring candidates to win in both riding and party, as far as it is possible. These "double winners" are elected immediately. Once either a party or riding has filled its allocation of seats, it is closed and all remaining candidates in it lose and are crossed out.  Next, the remaining seats are doled out one-by-one to the candidate who has more votes than any other candidate overall, subject to the above constraints of both riding and party. This continues until all seats have been allocated.

Past elections done using CPR rules show an astonishing 80% to 90% agreement with traditional first-past-the-post! In this regard it is far superior to MMP.

Another advantage of CPR over MMP is that party lists are not needed; political machines cannot game the system to put party leaders in a safe position on top of the list.

Still another advantage of CPR over MMP is that there are no "mixed members;" all members come from ridings and are thus equally legitimate.

No one else to my knowledge has invented the method of CPR elections, and thus CPR has never been used, but the principles behind it are sound.

I hope that British Columbia puts it to use; should it work there it will be a shining example to the rest of North America and the world.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy