Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission PELLOW-0615 (Online)

Submission ByMr Robert Pellow
AddressParksville, BC, Canada
Organization
Date20040610
CategoryDemocratic government
Abstract
One of the more interesting PR ideas I have heard is that of the weighted vote in the legislature. It is easily done because it does not demand large changes from our current way of electing members to the house. [2 pages]

Submission Content
One of the more interesting PR ideas I have heard is that of the weighted vote in the legislature.

It is easily done because it does not demand large changes from our current way of electing members to the house.

What happens, in essence, is that each party will be given a voting strength equivalent to its results on election day. When legislation is being passed through the house, the votes counted from each member will depend on the percentage of votes gained in the previous election.

Thus, in the current house, the two New Democrats elected would be entitled to a voting strength of approximately twenty per cent [estimate of percentage received in the last election] of the votes being taken on any particular bill being passed through the house. Their individual voting strength would express the popularity of the party at the previous election.

For Liberals, each member would have a voting strength of somewhat less than one vote because Liberals are overrepresented in the house at the moment.

As the Greens do not have any members elected, they would be entitled to have a party member seated in the house to represent their twelve per cent of the vote received in the previous election. This member would be chosen by finding the Green Party member who had achieved the highest percentage of the vote in the last election. This one person would control twelve percent of the voting strength on any bill that is being passed through the house. She would be representing Greens from throughout the province.

The last election was pretty atypical and a more usual result would produce a House that truly represented all of the citizens of British Columbia and not just those who were first past the post. But even given the skewed results of the last election, it would be possible to ensure the voice of the rest of the electorate would be heard through the relative strength of the parties in the house.

I think one could modify the concept to ensure that at least five members or so would sit for each party in addition to the constituency-elected representatives. These people would be chosen from the most successful of the second choice results in elections throughout the province. I wouldn't want to see party lists used to produce members.

I believe that such a system could be put in place easily, without a lot of expense, and could be implemented before the next election.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy