Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission NICOLL-0496 (Online)

Submission By Matthew Nicoll
AddressCourtenay, BC,
Organization
Date20040527
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
I suggest that the electoral reform selection process be organized so that if no proportional representation system can be agreed upon or approved by the public, that the Alternative Vote (Preferential) Ballot [AV] will be adopted. [1 page]

Submission Content
Summary:

I suggest that the electoral reform selection process be organized so that if no proportional representation system can be agreed upon or approved by the public, that the Alternative Vote (Preferential) Ballot will be adopted.

Argument:

Proportional representation schemes offer the greatest promise of improved representation, but are also subject to negative arguments. (E.g. too many small parties, too many minority governments etc.)

The Alternative Vote, where the voter indicates preferences on the ballot, may not promise as great an improvement, but it is inarguably an improvement. (I.e. there are no negative aspects to it, other than the trivial point that counting the votes is more complicated.) It would be a great relief to be able to vote for who I want to vote for, without worrying about aiding a candidate to whom I am opposed.

What I wish to avoid is a situation where your Assembly recommends a proportional system, it is put to the public in a referendum, it is turned down, and we get nothing. So my request is that you position the Alternative Vote as a fall-back. For example, if you recommend a proportional system, you could recommend to the government that if the proportional system is turned down by referendum, that the Alternative Vote be adopted.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy