Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission MAY-0241 (Online)

Submission ByDr Jon May
AddressSheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
Organization
Date20040428
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
I would like to recommend to you STV in multi-member consituencies (i.e., the system used in the Republic of Ireland) as an electoral system for the reasons set out in the submission [2 pages]

Submission Content
I am not a resident of British Columbia, but hope that my experiences of using the First-past-the-post (FPP) and Single Transferable Vote (STV) systems of voting can help your decisions.

I am writing to you in a personal capacity, although I am the elections officer for a scientific society which uses the STV for its internal elections. I administer the counting process.

I would like to recommend to you STV in multi-member consituencies (i.e., the system used in the Republic of Ireland) as an electoral system, because:

a) it maintains a geographical link between representatives and the electorate;
b) provides electorates with a choice of candidates from each party;
c) leaves the final say of the candidate selection with the electorate rather than with internal party committees;
d) leads to greater (although not perfect) proportionality in terms of seats for votes;
e) tends not to lead to single-party government (although this is still possible where one party is actually dominant in terms of votes)
f) does allow minority parties and special interest groups representation, albeit with a relatively large 'threshold'.

A weakness of STV is that the counting process can be time consuming, and apparently complex. However, if BC is also considering a move to electronic voting, then the count could be immediate. It is only time consuming where paper ballots have to be physically handled. In the elections that I supervise, voting is carried out electronically, and I have produced an Excel spreadsheet that counts the votes as soon as the data is entered (you can access this via http://www.shef.ac.uk/jonmay/stv.

I note that you seek to retain compatability with Westminster elections. Well, please don't wait for us! We are notoriously slow at adapting to the present day. Nevertheless, the Richards Commission has recently recommended STV for elections to the Welsh Assembly; they were used for the Ulster assembly; the Scottish Parliament has voted in favour of them; and they are currently under consideration for local council elections and regional parliaments. European elections are currently conducted via party lists within mulitimember seats, and there is every prospect of this changing to STV (The European Union is supposed to adopt a common system). Soon Westimster will be the odd part out of our democracy, and may well change too. It would be a shame for BC to have retained compatability with a system that even Westminster has abandoned!

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy