Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission MARTIN-0762 (Online)

Submission By Peter Martin
AddressVictoria, BC, Canada
Organization
Date20040628
CategoryElectoral system no change
Abstract
Mark Twain observed that there are some ideas which are neat, plausible and wrong. PR is one of them. [2 pages]

Submission Content
SOME CAUTIONARY WORDS ON PR.

I have followed your deliberations with interest. They seem to be long on subjective values - e.g. "fairness" - and short on objective consequences. It would seem your chosen path is towards some sort of modified PR so I would like to offer three or four comments and one recommendations.

  1. PR gives too much power to political party power brokers as they set the list of candidates. Consider that recently Italy, by referendum, voted by more than 90% to go from PR to FPTP. Why? Because it was seen as a major cause of political corruption.
  2. An inevitable consequence of PR will be the emergence of regional and ethnic parties. On the national scene, a Western Bloc. On the provincial scene, a First Nations Party. Those who have followed the circus surrounding various Federal Liberal nominations can easily imagine other special interest groups coming forward. There exists in Switzerland, a political party devoted to the interests of the St. Bernard dog.
  3. Minority government is portrayed as a positive outcome. Ha. Watch the outcome of the Federal election.
  4. PR is incompatible with fixed election dates. You cannot stick the electorate with a full 4 years of failing coallitions. If you want PR, you have to abandon fixed election dates.
But enough. Mark Twain observed that there are some ideas which are neat, plausible and wrong. PR is one of them.

Finally, a recommendation. Once PR is put in place, it becomes the self interest of political parties (as opposed to the electorate) to maintain PR. Put in a recommendation that in the second election after a change in electoral system, the choice whether to continue with PR or return to FPTP is a mandatory referendum question.

PS. The endless power brokering required by PR needs a President to manage the process and provide continuity. Are we prepared to have photogenic but unelected individuals such as the Governor General and Lieutenant Governor in charge?

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy