Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission KADULSKI-1241 (Online)

Submission By Richard Kadulski
AddressNorth Vancouver, BC,
Organization
Date20040813
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
An elected legislature should be a mix of constituency and party representatives; about 2/3 of the legislators elected directly in constituency ballots, with the balance of seats allocated to parties from regional party lists. [2 pages]

Submission Content
I support a shift to a more proportional representation system. No electoral system will be perfect, but few can be as unrepresentative as our current first past the post system, which works satisfactorily only where there are only two parties.

As more political groupings emerge, the first past the post system loses its representativeness. Very few Canadian governments have received an absolute majority -- democracy should represent the will of the people -- but under the current electoral system we have governance by minorities. It is scandalous that we have consistently had strong majority governments with as low as 36% of the popular vote (i.e. voter support).

A more representative electoral system is needed. There is much anguished talk about proportionality in election results leading to a perpetual state of minority governments. That anguish masks the rather novel thought (at least in today's world) that politicians have to act reasonably and take account of a variety of opinions when making decisions, and govern for all the people, not a select few supporters. Strong willed politicians will have to be more sensitive and will not be able to make rash decisions favoured within their own small cliques. The coalitions that currently happen inside political parties behind closed doors would become more open and better reflect the will of the population. An accommodation will be worked out, as it has in so many other parts of the world.

Proposed changes

I think that an elected legislature should be a mix of constituency and party representatives. About 2/3 of the legislators elected directly in constituencies in a first past the post ballot, with the balance of seats allocated to parties so that parliamentary make-up better reflects the popular vote. These at large or party list MLAs could perhaps be selected on a regional basis - say Vancouver Island, Lower Mainland, and Interior. That way, people would still have their own representative, plus additional party representative(s) directly attributed to a given region. The total numbers of MLAs could remain the same as today, with larger single member constituencies, or a few additional members - depending on what population ratio is deemed appropriate.

Voting would be single vote only for the constituency member. The selection of the party list members would be based on the total votes cast, with a threshold of 5% of total votes cast in the province to quality a party for representation in the Legislature.

Some people suggest that party lists deny voters the choice of representation since the party selects the candidates. I don't buy that argument. I don't have a say in who the party nominates as a candidate in the current system unless I chose to join a party and get involved in the party selection process. It is only party members that select those candidates. Members selected for proportional representation, (party list member) would not be any different. Those people that chose to get involved will still be able to participate in the party selection process, however the party decides to choose candidates.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy