Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission HANSON-0525 (Online)

Submission By Bill Hanson
AddressVictoria, BC, Canada
OrganizationThe Every Vote Counts Campaign
Date20040531
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
BC should adopt the Every Vote Counts electoral system; every candidate (win or lose) will have influence in the Legislature in proportion to the number of votes received. [3 pages]

Submission Content
[To see the submission in web format, together with related information, see http://www.crucible.ca/evc]

HAVE YOU BEEN DISENFRANCHISED LATELY?

In our current winner-take-all electoral system if your preferred candidate doesn't win then your political philosophies and aspirations have no voice in government from your riding. When this happens the only way that you will have a representative in government who speak for your political wishes will be if other ridings happen to elect them.

At what point does it become fair and reasonable for a candidate of one political philosophy to have the lone voice in government for his or her riding?

In the ongoing, and increasingly heated, debate about proportional representation much has been made about the fact that in a multi-candidate election winners with as little as 40% of the vote end up representing a riding in which 60% of the voters wanted somebody else. With a large enough field of well supported candidates running in a close race it is theoretically possible for a candidate to win after receiving as little as 30%, or even 20%, of the votes. In such a bizarre situation is there anyone among us would think it fair and reasonable that 80% of the voters in such an unfortunate riding should have no voice in government?

So I ask again "At what point does it become fair and reasonable for a candidate of one political philosophy to have the lone voice in government for his or her riding?" Do they need 51% of the votes for the other 49% not to matter? Do they need 80% for the other 20% not to matter?

Is there any point at which it is fair and reasonable to say that the interests and desires of those voters whose candidates lost don't matter? My answer is a resounding NO!

Based on the firm belief that the interests and desires of all voters always matter I propose that we adopt the:

THE "EVERY VOTE COUNTS" ELECTORAL SYSTEM
Absolute proportionality based on proxy voting

PROBLEM

We each cast our "one vote" at election time and our Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) each cast their "one vote" in questions before the legislature and we all feel secure that we are fulfilling the democratic ideal of "one person, one vote". In fact, we are not.

The reality is that the "one vote" of each MLA actually represents however many votes he or she received from the voters. The automatic result of this is that the votes of citizens from the more densely populated ridings count for less than those from the more sparsely populated ones. Even worse is the fact that all the votes of the all the citizens who voted for a candidate who wasn't elected do not count at all.

Instead of a system that guarantees "one person, one vote" we have one that results in some citizens having a partial vote, and others having no vote, in the running of our government.

SOLUTION

We can correct this fundamental flaw in our current electoral process by simply adopting the Every Vote Counts electoral system!

Under this system each candidate in each riding (win or lose) will hold proxy to the number of ballots cast in his or her favor in the election. He or she will hold those proxies until the next election and will have the right to cast them on behalf of his or her constituency as follows:

   1.  The candidate receiving the highest number of votes in each riding becomes the "Member of the Legislative Assembly" (MLA) for that riding until the next election just as they do now.  MLAs conduct the day-to-day affairs of government in exactly the same way as they do under our current procedures with the sole exception that all votes in the legislature will be poll votes with each MLA voting however many proxies he or she is entitled to vote rather than the current "one MLA one vote" system.

   2.  Each of the other candidates running in that riding becomes a "Member for a Riding Constituency" (MRC) until the next election.

   3.  MRCs observe the activities of the MLAs from their home ridings via:

     a) any government sources made available to them,

     b) the media,

     c) personal communication with other MRCs (and MLAs) who share their political philosophies.

   4.  Each MRC may then influence the day-to-day affairs of government by:

     a) Assigning the privilege of voting the proxies held by the MRC to any MLA from any riding whose words and actions in government the MRC believes are most in harmony with the wishes of the MRC's constituency.

     b) Transferring that privilege away from an MLA whose words and/or actions prove not to be in such harmony.

     c) Discussing/negotiating their conditions for an assignment or transfer of that privilege with any MLA involved to ensure that the expectations of the MRC and the intentions of the MLA are in harmony. 

   5.  Each MRC will be free to decide for him or herself how actively to exercise the right to assign and re-assign his or her proxies between elections. A personal decision that can be made according to how much time, energy and resources the MRC has to invest in moving his or her constituency's agenda forward and/or whether or not he or she is intending to be a candidate in the next election.

     a) MRCs can simply assign their proxies once and leave the privilege of voting them with their chosen MLA until the next election.

     b) They can assign them and only re-assign them when, and if, a significant portion of their constituency makes it clearly known to them that it wants them re-assigned.

~ or ~

     c) They can keep themselves constantly aware of what their chosen MLA and other MLAs are doing in government and be actively involved in trying to influence those MLAs by re-assigning their proxies whenever they believe it is in the best interests of their constituency to do so

   6.  The more proxies any MLA holds the right to vote (on behalf of his or her own constituency) and the privilege to vote (on behalf of various MRC's constituencies) the more say he or she will have in conducting the affairs of government. Every vote will count!

SUMMATION

Adopting the Every Vote Counts electoral system in BC will generate many benefits and can be done quickly and inexpensively with no changes needed to how we currently run our elections, only in how we interpret the results and how we implement them in our legislature!

To find out more about The Every Vote Counts electoral system, its benefits (45 listed as of this writing), how it might be implemented, how you can support its implementation and how you can get in contact with its other supporters please visit http://www.crucible.ca/evc

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy