Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission FREED-1039 (Online)

Submission ByMs Keren Freed
AddressVancouver, BC, Canada
Organization
Date20040810
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
I am opposed to the current electoral system and favour MMP. I am not in favour of STV and even less in favour of the 'Preferential Plus' proposal by Nick Loenen. [2 pages]

Submission Content
1.  I am strongly in favour of mixed member proportional representation (MMP) with a reasonable minimum percentage lower threshold to get a seat.

Reasons: The many countries around the world where this system is now used have a much better record of fairer representation while preserving some local representation. They also elect more women and minorities. As a woman, this is important to me, along with the idea that each of our votes counts. The minimum threshold is to eliminate the problems encountered in Israel where they don't have a minimum and the system doesn't work. On the other hand, I am in favour of minority governments that work together to meet the needs of all the people, not just a slim majority.

2.  I am strongly opposed to keeping the system we have.

Reasons: It is unfair. The number of seats won should closely reflect the percentage of votes cast for that party. Clearly that is not the case now. With 58% of the vote, the BC Liberal Party got 98% of the seats in the last election. The system we choose should not allow this to happen. It should guarantee that the 42% of the people who did not vote Liberal are politically represented in the legislature. Clearly this system does not consistently do that.

3.  I am very strongly opposed to the single transferable vote (STV) system.

Reasons: I am not in favour of choosing a system that sounds excellent in theory but in practice doesn't work consistently. In particular, Malta and Ireland have very few women reps and at one point, didn't Malta fail to elect the government with a majority of the vote?

4.  I am even more opposed to the "preferential plus" system proposed by Nick Loenen.

Reasons: It seems to be a blatant attempt to ensure a one-sided, un-representative government in perpetuity, incorporating nearly all the disadvantages I have outlined above.

I trust you will listen to the majority of the people of this province who have taken the trouble to respond to your request for input and recommend a fair system that represents minorities as well as majorities, and in practice elects a more favourable percentage of women. Thank you for all your hard work.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy