Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission BURKE-0885 (Online)

Submission ByMr Patrick Burke
AddressFernie, BC,
Organization
Date20040721
CategoryElectoral system change
Abstract
I support Preferential Transferable Voting [AV] as a way that people can vote for candidates and platforms that most represent of their values. [2 pages]

Submission Content
I support Preferential Transferable Voting [AV] as a way that people can vote for candidates and platforms that most represent of their values. They could vote for the selection of candidates in their own preferential order. Although their candidate may or may not get in, the majority of the voters will have an outcome that they all can live with.

One example of where Preferential Transferable Voting would have brought a beneficial outcome to a large number of people can be found several years ago here in Canada when the people of Thunder Bay, Ontario voted on what they wanted their city to be called. There were several options on the ballot but people were divided in opinion primarily between three choices; "The Lakehead", "Lakehead", or the current name.

While in the end Thunder Bay won, it was only by a small majority and had they been given the opportunity to rate their options in order of preference, it is almost certain that the large number of people divided between "The Lakehead" and "Lakehead" would have compromised and been satisfied with either one.

Thus, had Preferential Ballot Counting been in place, a greater number of people would have been satisfied with the result achieved.

As the number of Candidates and political parties grow, some government representatives are being elected with as little as 30% of the popular vote.

How does the Preferential Transferable Voting Work?

Let us say we have 5 canadidates:

    Candidate #1, Candidate #2, Candidate #3, Candidate #4, Candidate #5

My ballot might be in ballot order 3 2 1 5 4 with 4 being my last place choice.

If the first candidate that I like very much is dropped on the first count then I can still have a opportunity to participate in the election with my second, third, forth, fifth preferences. I can freely place my vote not fearing that my vote will be thrown away and perhaps I could live with one of the other candidates but not that last candidate.

We live with choices and compromises in our life all the time. We go to a restaurant and want to order a steak but the restaurant is out of steak so our second preference is chicken.

I developed the software for the Reform Party of Canada and later the Reform Alliance, now the conservative party of Canada on this voting system. It produces acceptable results to most people that have used it in over 500 Candidate selections and 5 National Assemblies across Canada. In reviewing many of the elections, ballots were clearly marked in order of preference by 99.9% of all people that cast ballots.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy