Contact UsSearch
Click for Search Instructions
Home > Get Involved

Submission BRENNEISEN-1367 (Online)

Submission By Paul Brenneisen
AddressDunster, BC,
Organization
Date20040823
CategoryElectoral system no change
Abstract
Having lived with the results of the mixed member proportional [MMP] system in Germany I can only emphasize the importance of not implementing it in BC. [2 pages]

Submission Content
Having lived with the results of the mixed member proportional [MMP] system in Germany I can only emphasize the importance of not implementing it in BC.

Since many years  the following happens:

There are 2 big political parties, Conservatives and Social Democrats. They each have a firm voter base of roughly 35% each. Furthermore there are 2 smaller parties, Liberals and Green Party which often are only able to just jump over the 5% hurdle which entitles them to send representatives to Parliament.

None of the 2 big parties can form the Government alone and need one or 2 of the smaller Parties as a partner. Plain blackmail and continuous threats of leaving the Government block are regular occurrences. Needless to say all well intended and necessary legislature is watered down to the point were nobody even recognizes the original ideas.

In addition a lot of the representatives send to Parliament are selected from lists and are not voted for directly.  This becomes necessary to allow for the balance in the popular vote compared to the majority vote. A very bad idea since they do not represent a riding and can't therefore be held accountable directly by their continuance. In fact nobody knows up front which people and how many are selected from these lists until the ballots have been counted.  Those seats are rather like patronage appointments. There is no way to get rid of bad politicians under this system or even get rid of a bad party all together since there is always a part of the population who will vote for them no matter what.

So what if votes fall by the wayside because only the front runner in each riding gets to Parliament. This will happen in the mixed system as well if your party of choice does not reach the 5% hurdle. Or if there is no minimum percentage required we will end up like the Parliament in the German Weimar Republic between the wars. Just imagine dozens of parties represented in Victoria including radical splinter groups and special interest societies like the "United  Dog Lovers of BC".

I sooner have the advantage of a Government which actually is able to make decisions and follows through than the endless bickering and horse-trading required in many European countries.

How many members of Parliament will we end up with under the proposed reform? If the riding numbers stay the same and every riding sends one majority member the total must be way more than it is today since the politicians who slide in via the proportional mandates are in addition to the others. Don't we have enough politicians already?  Or are all members to be selected proportionally and are we doing away with the majority vote all together?

I feel this electoral reform proposal is nothing but sour grapes initiated by people who can't get their agenda through because they do not have the support in their riding they need.

I think we have the very best available voting system in Canada. The only thing I would change is to require set voting dates instead of leaving   the Government with the freedom to call an election within a non too specific time frame. Voting should be done at a pre-fixed date.  Say every 4 years. Regardless of the popularity the governing party has at the time.

© 2003 Citizens' Assembly on Electoral ReformSite powered by levelCMSSite Map | Privacy Policy